Wolfowitz should have studied Che

I recently watched Steven Soderbergh’s two part film project based on Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara’s memoir “Reminiscences of the Cuban Revolutionary War”.

I found it to be extraordinarily pertinent for community organizers. It shows that development can only be sustained from within. This constant is demonstrated through the difference of Che's role in Cuba and then Bolivia with a clear view of the results.

In Cuba, Che played a supporting role in Castro' s revolution. On various occasions, Che was relegated to medical support rather than leadership of a column. This validates the appropriate and most functional role for outsiders engaged in organizational efforts. Che provided critical support in a role that he was trained to perform. A role that was needed and there was not sufficient local capacity to perform. When a Cuban capable of performing the role appeared, he moved on to another training role.

The documentary makes clear that the Cuban revolution was an indigenous effort led by Cuban nationals who had investments in the process on different levels. You see the importance of family and professional networks that went well beyond ideological solidarity or strategic interests.

A second significant role that Che played for the Cuban revolution was that of international spokesperson. As a highly educated vagabond documented in the motorcycle diaries, Che had the life experiences and literary flair to play the role of international revolutionary rock star. He played this role in support of and with the direction of an indigenous movement. He was not an outside media star imposing a strategy or ideology on a third-party; rather, he was a spokesperson for that movement.

Analyzing his tragic adventures in Bolivia we can witness the disastrous results of failing to follow the prime directive of community organizing. In the Bolivian experience, we find Che and his merry band of international zealots attempting to jump start a peasant revolution. Che's frustration is almost palatable as he begins to experiences the lack of commitment and integrity of his Bolivian counterparts. In him, we also see the arrogance of the expert attempting to impose a strategy rather than fostering of local leadership. In Che's Bolivian experiment, we witness the problems of not engaging family networks, lack of personal ownership over processes, lack of ego or material investment in the process and impatience in building community capacity and organizational infrastructure. In the end, Che's failure to follow basic organizing practices is a fatal error that is as costly for the Bolivian peasants as it is for his band of Cuban followers.

Therefore, community organizers must support local community development whether we are attempting to spread a worker's utopian revolution or democracy in the Middle East. Unless we have a Messiah complex, the rule of development must be followed lest we wish for others to suffer along.